Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1932No. A-8336PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Canadian county of having the possession of a still and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to serve six months in the county jail.

Certain officers discovered a still on the premises of one Warren. They laid in wait for a day or more until defendant came to the place, and, according to the state’s testimony, put his hand on a part of the still, picked up a sack from a barrel of mash, shook it and placed it over the barrel, and, when the officers made their presence known, he started to run.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Bruner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Sprouse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Elms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Walters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Padillow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Yoder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Gatewood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API