Legal Opinion
Bruner v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 23, 1925No. A-4430PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
For brevity, the plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant.
Both the defendant and deceased are negroes, and were brothers-in-law. Defendant was 26 years old and a veteran of the World War. The deceased was 48 years old. Some slight misunderstanding had arisen between them, but, so far as the record discloses there had never been any quarrel or dissension of any kind. On Sunday, April 2, 1921, defendant went on horseback to the town of Seminole, and on his way went by the house of deceased. Their relations appeared amicable. Defendant claimed to be going to the house of a relative to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Morris v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- Sandy White v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cannon v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- Douma v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Padillow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.