Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1998No. 18441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Presiding Judge.

The state has appealed from a judgment of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in a pill bottle that was in defendant’s pocket during a weapons patdown. The state argues that the trial court incorrectly granted the motion because the “plain feel” doctrine allowed the officer who patted down defendant to examine the contents of a pill bottle he found while conducting a weapons patdown of defendant. This court reverses the judgment of the trial court because the plain-feel doctrine justified the search of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. RushingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ball v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Ex Parte WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. State v. White, Unpublished Decision (6-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. Potter, Ca2006-07-166 (8-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Ex Parte WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API