State v. Lee
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, Presiding Judge.
The state has appealed from a judgment of the Summit County Common Pleas Court that granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence found in a pill bottle that was in defendant’s pocket during a weapons patdown. The state argues that the trial court incorrectly granted the motion because the “plain feel” doctrine allowed the officer who patted down defendant to examine the contents of a pill bottle he found while conducting a weapons patdown of defendant. This court reverses the judgment of the trial court because the plain-feel doctrine justified the search of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HalczyszakOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RushingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ball v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Ex Parte WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State v. White, Unpublished Decision (6-14-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. Potter, Ca2006-07-166 (8-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ex Parte WarrenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.