Legal Opinion
Barnhardt v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 9, 2008No. Civil Action 07-0624 (JDB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint or for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
According to plaintiff, on February 13, 2004, Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) officers Curt Sloan (“Sgt.Sloan”), Allee Ramadhan (“Det.Ramadhan”), and “John Doe” visited his home “for the alleged purpose of serving Plaintiff with [a] Grand Jury subpoena.” 1 Amended Complaint (“Amd.Compl.”) ¶ 15. Plaintiff was outside of the house when…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnhardt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Moonblatt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Williams v. MartinezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Paul v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Barnhardt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.