Legal Opinion

Stucker v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Slander. The declaration, so far as it necessary to state it, alleges that a certain horse belonging to the defendant 'had been stolen, and that he, the defendant, in a conversation with divers persons of and concerning the plaintiff and of and concerning said larceny, falsely and maliciously spoke and published of and concerning the plaintiff and of and concerning said larceny the false, scandalous, and defamatory words following, to wit, I (meaning defendant) know who has my horse (meaning the horse so as aforesaid stolen); and he (the plaintiff meaning) has my horse. I (defendant meaning)…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seller v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Garrett v. Bissell Chilled Plow WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Jones v. DiverIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Keesling v. McCallIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Stutsman v. StutsmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API