Wallis v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Code § 81-1413 provides for a continuance in case of the absence of counsel for providential cause if the unrepresented party will swear that he cannot safely go to trial without the services of his absent counsel, that he expects his services at the next term and that the application is not made for delay only. There is language in older cases to the effect that mere absence of an attorney without the consent of the client, is not a sufficient ground for a continuance. Allen v. State, 10 Ga. 85 (1); Long v. State, 38 Ga. 491 (4); Giles v. State, 66 Ga. 344 (1). It goes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MatishMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hasty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Millwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Stephens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Kirk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.