Hasty v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Presiding Judge.
The questions on appeal are whether the trial court erred in finding that defendant Hasty appeared at trial without counsel due to lack of diligence and, if so, whether the court erred in denying a new trial. Hasty’s direct appeal was remanded to the trial court to determine why Hasty appeared without counsel, after having been warned that he would have to proceed by himself if he appeared without representation. Hasty v. State, 210 Ga. App. 722, 723 (1) (437 SE2d 638) (1993). Hasty was represented at the hearing on remand by the same court-appointed counsel who…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rice v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Clarke v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wayne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Prater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Ledford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Raines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.