Legal Opinion

Rickert v. Travelers Ins. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1937No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 39,565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of defendant company. The trial court determined, as a question of law, that the failure of the insured to inform the insurer that he visited a physician on July 11, 1934, when he was treated for indigestion, was a fraud upon the company.

LaDoyte Clemans applied for $3,000 of life insurance on February 1, 1936, in favor of his partner and was physically examined by Dr. Stiefel of Battle Creek on the same day. His application contained, among others, the following questions and answers:

"Have you within the past 10 years received medical advice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blumenthal v. Berkshire Life-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Plumb v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Bellestri-Fontana v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. GeleynseMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ranger, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. Of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. New York Life Insurance v. NewmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Polish Roman Catholic Union v. PalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Miller v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
  5. Thelen v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API