Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Procunier

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1968No. Civ. 924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

This appeal tests the question whether the time spent by a defendant in a diagnostic facility of the Department of Corrections prior to judgment must he credited to the defendant on his sentence. Frank Hale Bennett petitioned the Superior Court of Kern County for a writ of mandate ordering the prison officials to give credit on the sentence of the defendant for the 90 days spent by him pursuant to court order in the diagnostic facility at Chino State Prison from January 6, 1965, through April 6, 1965. He had been convicted of a felony in the Superior Court of Riverside County. Before…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HarmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re KirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In Re DaupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. PodestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. In Re MorenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. Crawford CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API