Legal Opinion

In Re Kirk

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1965No. Crim. 9195PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

This case presents the same problem involved in In re Estrada, ante, p. 740 [48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948], this day decided. That problem, as applied to this case, is whether petitioner is entitled to the benefits of a statute ameliorating the punishment passed after the criminal act was committed but before the judgment of conviction became final. In the Estrada case, supra, we held that an accused man was entitled to the benefits of the amendatory act. Under the rule there announced petitioner in the instant case is also entitled to the benefit of the amendatory act.

Petitioner is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. FrahsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. NasalgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. People v. EsquivelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. Von GeldernHawaii Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API