Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Podesto

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 1976No. Crim. 2292PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J.

Statement of the Case

Appellants were jointly charged by information with violation of Health and Safety Code section 11359, possession of marijuana for sale. Appellant Podesto was also charged with violation of Health and Safety Code section 11360, transportation of marijuana. Following denial of their respective 1538.5 motions to suppress, Podesto pleaded guilty to possession of marijuana for sale, and the charge of transporting marijuana was dismissed in the interests of justice. Appellant Sproul pleaded guilty to violation of Health and Safety Code section 11357,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. ChaversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. SahagunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. People v. AxtellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API