Legal Opinion
Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. Catron
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1982No. 13725, 13749PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIORDAN, Justice.
The Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) filed a condemnation action to condemn property, adjacent to the property owned by Peter Pineda, Dana Pineda, Mark Ish and Nancy Fischer (Appellants), for a high voltage overhead electrical transmission line. Appellants filed a Complaint in Intervention seeking damages for inverse condemnation. The district court granted a motion to dismiss the Complaint in Intervention for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Appellants filed their Notice of Appeal, pursuant to N.M.R.Civ.App. 3(a), N.M.S.A.1978, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. KottsickWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Board of County Com'rs, Lincoln County v. HarrisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Cammack v. WaiheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Primetime Hospitality, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Sunland Park v. Santa Teresa Services Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.