Boston Oil & Guano Co. v. Williams

1. The admission of the parol testimony of the plaintiff, complained of in the first- assignment of error, was not such harmful error' as to require the grant of a new trial, since the defendant admitted in its answer the quantity, quality, and price of the cottonseed meal sold by it to the plaintiff.

*686Decided January 29, 1918. Complaint; from city court of Thomasville^-Judge W. H. Hammond. March 24, 1917. Titus, Delete & Hoplcins, for plaintiff in error. Branch & Snow, Merrill & Grantham, contra.

2. “Cottonseed meal is a ‘commercial fertilizer’ and ‘fertilizer material’ within the meaning of…