Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Swift & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 14, 1921No. 12547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mortgage foreclosure; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Park presiding. May 13, 1921. Application for certiorari was made to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

This ease is admittedly controlled by the ruling of this court in Arlington Oil & Guano Co. v. Swann, 13 Ga. App. 562 (5) (79 S. E. 476), where it was held that "A certified copy of the official analysis of a brand of fertilizer registered with the Department of Agriculture is admissible in evidence in any of the courts of this State, in any case in which the question of the actual ingredients contained in the fertilizer is material. After a brand of fertilizer is registered with the Department of Agriculture, the grade can not be lowered; and it is therefore to be presumed that all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Cordele Guano Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Arlington Oil & Guano Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  3. Boston Oil & Guano Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Georgia Fertilizer Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API