Legal Opinion

Rowe v. Sam Weichselbaum Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1908No. 558PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Trover, from city court of Dublin — Judge Burch. May 6, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, J.

Bowe brought an action of trover and bail against Sam Weichselbaum Company. The plaintiff elected to take a money verdict, and a verdict was rendered against the defendant for $200, with interest. Upon the defendant’s motion, the trial judge granted a new trial, and thereupon the plaintiff excepted. A new trial was granted, “solely upon the ground that the affidavit and purchase-money proceeding based thereon, instituted by Sam "Weichselbaum Company against W. L. Moye, should be tried as *505.an admission capable of explanation, and not as an estoppel, .and that said admission was fully explained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allen v. SchweigertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London Ltd. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Burk v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Fargason v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Hamilton v. WillifordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. ManryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Stokes v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Jordan v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Mitchell v. CastlenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Ellison & Chew v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API