Legal Opinion

Apostolos v. Estrada

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1958No. Civ. 22764PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal by the plaintiff and a judgment creditor of the latter from an order denying their several motions to vacate an order granting defendants’ motion for new trial.

This litigation was initiated by plaintiff Apostólos against the defendants Estrada and Railway Express Agency to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiff as a result of the negligence of the defendants named.

During the pendency of the action and prior to trial, the appellant Corsones (hereinafter referred to as lien claimant) pursuant to proceedings had under…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People Ex Rel. Bledsoe v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Finance & Construction Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernard Duran Carmona, Bankrupt v. Gilbert Robinson, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Hersch v. Boston InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Egly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Maple v. Cincinnati, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Tukes v. RichardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API