Legal Opinion

Burlew v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 17, 1938PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

Affirming.

In 1927, the appellant, who was the owner of a lot in the residential section of Owensboro, Kentucky, entered into a written -contract with L. A. Monarch, as contractor, for the construction of a brick residence, servants’ quarters, garden wall and garage thereon, for the sum of $34,000 plus the cost of such extras as might be added as the work progressed. By the terms of the contract the contractor agreed to furnish all labor and materials and to completely construct the buildings,. including plumbing, hot water heating and electric wiring,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Union Central Life Ins. v. SpinksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Nugent v. Nugent's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  4. Webb v. Kentucky Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. BancoKentucky Co.'s Receiver v. National Bank of Kentucky's ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API