Legal Opinion

Tingley v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 19, 1937No. 27409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

This appeal is by sureties to reverse the judgment of the trial court entered against them on a replevin bond.

As is usual in such a case, there were two lawsuits involved; the first one being the replevin action itself, and the second being the present action, on the bond filed by the former .plaintiff when he instituted the replevin action.

Fred Gantz was the mortgagee of certain personal property owned by H. G. Smith and Glen Smith. Alleging default in the mortgage, by reason of which he was entitled to possession of the mortgaged property for the purpose of foreclosing the mortgage, he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Dupree v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Federal National Bank v. LindseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Gripe v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API