Legal Opinion

McDermott v. Party City Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 30, 1998No. Civil Action 95-3683PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Donna and Jeffrey McDermott, individually and on behalf of the McDermott Group, Inc., (collectively “plaintiffs”), initiated this lawsuit against defendant Philip Nasuti (“Na-suti”), 1 asserting both contract and tort claims. Plaintiffs alleged that Nasuti breached a stock purchase agreement, under which Nasuti was to purchase stock in, and perform management services for, the McDermott Group, Inc. (“the McDermott Group”), a Pennsylvania corporation formed by the McDermotts for the sole purpose of operating a Party City franchise store in King of…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  5. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Smith v. Fairfax Realty, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. First Sealord Surety v. Durkin & Devries Insurance AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API