Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 7, 1985No. 82-1692-CIV-HASTINGSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

HASTINGS, District Judge.

The issue of the Court’s jurisdiction over one of the Defendants again comes before the Court in the Motion of Defendant, VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (VWAG), for Reconsideration of Court’s Order of October 23, 1984, Denying VOLKSWAGENWERK AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT’s Motion to Dismiss, to Quash Process, and to Quash Service of Process (Special Appearance). Both parties have fully briefed this issue.

Plaintiffs first challenge Defendants’ right to ask the Court to reconsider its October 23, 1984 Order on Pending Motions, as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Ex Parte Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Richardson v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
  4. Jones v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Luise Light v. Isabel WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. Dewey v. VOLKSWAGEN AGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. Schlunk v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Zisman v. SiegerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Wasden v. Yamaha Motor Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API