Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 16, 1983No. 82-202PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original petition to this Court for a writ of mandamus directed to Honorable Fred W. Nicol, Circuit Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, to review a ruling made by him that overruled a prior motion to quash service of process and to order him to re-enter his original order granting the motion of petitioner, Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft (VWAG), to quash service.

VWAG, a German corporation, contends that the purported service of process is invalid for two reasons: (1) service of the summons and complaint by certified mail on VWAG pursuant to Rule 4.4 (b) of the Alabama Rules of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Martin v. Loeb & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte Alloy Wheels Intern., Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Horizons 2000, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. In Re Lupron Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API