Legal Opinion

Chitwood v. City & County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 20, 1948No. 16,086PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court. They appeared individually as taxpayers and voters of the City and County of Denver, and also on behalf of all others similárly situated, seeking an order of court holding that the proposed scheme for a “Valley Highway” under a certain Ordinance No. 50, series of 1948, was unlawful and void and beyond the discretion of the mayor or the city council to adopt, promote or perform. Plaintiffs also seek to have the ordinance itself declared unlawful and unconstitutional in its objects, purpose and effect, and to have defendants enjoined and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Milheim v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Welch v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Herr v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Barrington v. CokinosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Barrington v. CokinosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API