Legal Opinion
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 21, 1947No. Civ. No. 3999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON, District Judge.
The United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, has appeared specially and moved the court to quash the summons against the Treasurer of the United States. He has also moved to dismiss the action against the United States.
The basis for the motion to quash the summons against the Treasurer is the allegation that he is subject to action in his official position only in the District of Columbia.
The motion to dismiss the action against the United States is founded on the proposition that the Act of Congress, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), giving jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lynn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. AlireSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clement Martin, Inc. v. Dick Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951