Legal Opinion

Moss v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 6, 1983No. 82-2383PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiffs, Jennifer Moss and her parents Donald and Margaret Moss, appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in favor of defendant, Earl S. Meyer d/b/a Shrout Pharmacy, finding that the actions of Jennifer Moss constituted an intervening superseding cause to the negligence of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiffs raise the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiff’s actions were superseding or intervening where the resulting injuries were a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s actions; and (2) whether the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tate v. CanonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. First National Bank v. City of AuroraIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Orcutt v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Repinski v. Jubilee Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Little v. Chicago Hoist & Body Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rose Cleveland, Individually and in Her Capacity as of the Estate of Robert Cleveland, Esquire, Deceased v. Michael RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Turcios v. The DeBruler CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Chalhoub v. DixonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Turcios v. The DeBruler CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Kleen v. Homak Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API