Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kleen v. Homak Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1—99—4417, 1—99—4465 consPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiff Gregory Kleen (Gregory) brought this wrongful death and survival action under theories of negligence and strict product liability, individually and as special administrator of the estate of David Kleen (David), against defendants Homak Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Homak), Gander Mountain, Inc., GRS, Inc., and GMO, Inc. (collectively Gander), following the death of his son David. Homak and Gander filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to section 2—615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—615 (West 1998)), arguing that the complaint failed to state a cause of action…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. First Springfield Bank & Trust v. GalmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Williams v. University of Chicago HospitalsIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Little v. Chicago Hoist & Body Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Schultz v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Rose Cleveland, Individually and in Her Capacity as of the Estate of Robert Cleveland, Esquire, Deceased v. Michael RotmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Hooper v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. Malen v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Turcios v. The DeBruler CompanyIllinois Supreme Court · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API