Legal Opinion

People v. Walker

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1924No. Crim. No. 1105PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses. The information charges that one Elgin and his wife paid to defendant $1,500 for a partnership interest in a business conducted by her as a divine healer, and that the payment was made because of false representations which defendant made to the Elgins that she “was ... a divine healer, and that she . . . had patients, suffering from confining illnesses, maladies and diseases, sufficient in number to more than fill an eleven-room sanitarium or house, and that she . . . was . . . seeking to lease or rent a sanitarium…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. De WolfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  2. Palladine v. Imperial Valley Farm Lands Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. DegnenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. BeilfussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API