Legal Opinion
Bartel v. Zucktriegel
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 28, 2002No. 20442-1-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
47 P.3d 581 (2002)
112 Wash.App. 55
William and Sharon BARTEL, husband and wife, and Les Eldredge, a single person, Respondents,
v.
Richard ZUCKTRIEGEL, a single person, and Caf Mozart, Appellants.
No. 20442-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.
May 28, 2002.
Joseph R. Jackson, East Wenatchee, for Appellants.
Robert R. Siderius, Jr., Wenatchee, for Respondents.
SWEENEY, J.
Creditors in Washington can garnish a debtor's future earnings to satisfy a judgment. RCW 6.27.330. The earnings subject to garnishment include "compensation paid or payable ... for personal services." RCW…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Miller v. BadgleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Bloor v. FritzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- SCM Group USA, Inc. v. Protek Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Alina Farooq v. Azeem KhanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- Crista Ministries v. Alganesh W. MashoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.