Legal Opinion

Alina Farooq v. Azeem Khan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 19, 2021No. 80970-9Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ALINA FAROOQ, No. 80970-9-I Appellant, DIVISION ONE v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION AZEEM AHMED KHAN, Respondent. APPELWICK, J. —The trial court denied Farooq’s motion to quash a writ of garnishment. Farooq failed to meet her burden to prove she did not own the funds deposited in a joint bank account. And, Farooq did not identify a substantial injury resulting from a failure to comply with statutory garnishment procedures. The trial court acted within its discretion. We affirm. FACTS Following a 2017 family law hearing, the court entered an order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Martini v. PostCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Yakima Adjustment Service, Inc. v. DurandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. In Re Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Terhune v. N. Cascade Tr. Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API