Legal Opinion

MIDDLEBROOKS v. CLAVIJO

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 9, 2020No. 2:19-cv-16991Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TRAVIS MIDDLEBROOKS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No, 19-1699] OPINION & ORDER v. JUAN CLAVIJO, et al., Defendants. John Michael Vazquez, U.S.D.J. Plaintiff Travis Middlebrooks seeks to bring this action in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. D.E. 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS his application to proceed in forma pauperis but DISMISSES the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Under Section 1915, this Court may excuse a litigant from prepayment of fees when the litigant “establish[es]…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API