Legal Opinion

Foerster v. Direito

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 12, 1946No. Civ. 7220PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants, Pete Bordenave and Garrett W. Beckley, as individuals, and as members of the firm of Bordenave & Beckley, and Homer Bennie McDowell, have appealed from a judgment which was rendered pursuant to the verdict of a jury against them in a suit for damages for the death of George Russell Foerster, the son of plaintiff, which occurred as the result of being struck by a truck driven by McDowell on the wrong side of Center Street in the city of Stockton. The deceased, in company with an associate, was standing, under the glare of a street light, on the walk which crossed the highway in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Parsons v. EastonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Gilmore v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  2. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Currie v. FitingMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Risley v. LenwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Tyson v. RomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API