Legal Opinion
Kaplan v. Washington County Community Social Services
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 5, 1993No. C0-92-1073PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Anthony Kaplan appeals from an order of the district court affirming a decision by the Commissioner of Human Services. The Commissioner 'determined a person with Tourette Syndrome is not eligible for case management and home and community-based services for persons with mental retardation or a related condition under Minn. Stat. § 256B.092, subds. 1, 4 (1990). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Anthony Kaplan is a nine-year-old child with Tourette Syndrome. Test results have shown Kaplan’s intelligence is normal. However, he has serious functional limitations due to the Tourette…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Fisher Nut Co. v. Lewis Ex Rel. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Koenning v. SuehsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- Krulish v. State Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994