Legal Opinion

Koenning v. Suehs

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 18, 2012No. Civil Action No. V-11-6PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN D. RAINEY, Senior District Judge.

Bradley Koenning (“Koenning”), Brian Martin (“Martin”), and Morgan Ryals (“Ryals”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are three disabled young adults who allege that they require custom power wheelchairs with integrated standing features (“mobile standers”) to meet their medical, functional, and mobility needs. Defendant Thomas Suehs, Executive Commissioner of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, (hereinafter “THHSC”),1 act*532ing through the Texas Medicaid and Healthcare Partnership (TMHP), denied Plaintiffs’ requests for…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Detgen ex rel. Detgen v. JanekDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Pharmacy Buying Assoc., Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2012
  3. Dartmouth-Hitchcock et al v. NH DHHSDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  4. Harrison v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  5. Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. Jessica Lukefahr, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API