Legal Opinion

Daraban v. Township of Redford

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1969No. Docket 3,956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPratt, J.

This is a zoning case in which the plaintiff landowner seeks to have declared invalid zoning-ordinance provisions of Bedford township as they apply to his land. Prom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the township appeals.

The plaintiff is the owner of six lots on the north side of Joy road a block from the intersection of Inkster road. All of the lots front on Joy road and each is roughly 60 feet wide and 120 feet deep. Pour of the lots comprise the entire Joy road frontage between Mercedes and San Jose. The remaining two lots are located immediately east of San Jose. At the time this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Roll v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dequindre Development Co. v. Charter Township of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Redford Moving & Storage Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Daraban v. Township of RedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Belkin v. City of BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Daraban v. Township of RedfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API