Town of Seabrook v. Perkins
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C.J.
Petition for declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) to determine whether the prior votes of the towns of Seabrook and Windham in 1971 approving of the issuance *38of a license for the holding of dog race meets in those towns (RSA 284:15-c(supp.), Laws 1971, 541:8) can be rescinded at the forthcoming March 7, 1972, town meeting. It is not disputed that the defendants seek another vote in their respective towns to rescind the previous votes approving the issuing of licenses for holding dog race meets by the Greyhound Racing Commission.
The petitions to insert articles in the respective town warrants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chief of Police of Dracut v. Town of DracutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- North Shore Corp. v. Selectmen of TopsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- North Hampton Racing & Breeding Ass'n v. New Hampshire Racing CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
- Goodrich Falls Electric Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Berkshire Downs, Inc. v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Marsh v. Town of HanoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Seabrook Citizens for the Defense of Home Rule v. Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Kelly v. New Hampshire Pari-Mutuel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's FoundationArizona Supreme Court · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.