Legal Opinion
State v. Markley
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1949No. 30968PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
The appellant, Charles S. Markley, was tried and convicted of the offense of operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was under suspension. The statute defining the offense is Rem. Rev. Stat., Vol. 7A, § 6312-69 [P.P.C. § 289-53], which reads as follows:
“Any person whose vehicle operator’s license has been suspended, revoked or cancelled, and who shall operate any motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state while such license is suspended, revoked or cancelled, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor ...”
In order to obtain a conviction of this offense, the state must…
2Cited by5 opinions
- City of Seattle v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- City of Aberdeen v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. ChurchillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977