Legal Opinion

State v. French

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 17, 1977No. 7762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle after her operating privileges had been revoked, contrary to RSA 262:27-b (Supp. 1975). The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that RSA 262:27-b (Supp. 1975) only proscribes the operation of a motor vehicle in this state after the defendant’s license to operate has been suspended or revoked and does not proscribe operation of a motor vehicle in this state after the defendant’s operating privileges have been suspended or revoked. The state objected to the motion and the Trial Court {Morrill, J.) transferred the issue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. FredSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. State v. AlbersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Rickard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. State v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heying v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. In re HitchcockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API