State v. French
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
The defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle after her operating privileges had been revoked, contrary to RSA 262:27-b (Supp. 1975). The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that RSA 262:27-b (Supp. 1975) only proscribes the operation of a motor vehicle in this state after the defendant’s license to operate has been suspended or revoked and does not proscribe operation of a motor vehicle in this state after the defendant’s operating privileges have been suspended or revoked. The state objected to the motion and the Trial Court {Morrill, J.) transferred the issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia v. FredSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State v. AlbersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Rickard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- State v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heying v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- In re HitchcockSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978