Legal Opinion

Sutton Corp. v. Metropolitan District Commission

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 21, 1995No. 93-P-1765PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Warner, CJ.

Sutton Corporation (Sutton), a construction

and excavation contractor, brought an action in the Superior Court against the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC)1 seeking payment for added expenses incurred dur*765ing the completion of a public works contract for the installation of sand drains as part of site preparation relative to the project for the replacement of the General Lawrence Bridge in Medford. The case was referred to a master, “facts final,” and the parties waived a jury. Following nine days of testimony and requests for findings by both sides, the master issued a final…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Glynn v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Melrose Housing Authority v. New Hampshire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  3. ALBRE MARBLE & TILE CO. INC. v. GovermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. Meehan v. North Adams Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. D. Federico Co., Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sutton Corp. v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Dominic Gentile Painting Co. v. Aulson Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000
  3. Earth Tech Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. v. Perini/Kiewit/CashmanMassachusetts Superior Court · 2004
  4. John J. Petruzzi-William E. Forrester, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
  5. West Valley Corp. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API