Legal Opinion
Meehan v. North Adams Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 16, 1939PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The facts appear in the report of a master. The plaintiff was a clergyman in Greenfield. He was friendly with one Coyne, a young man in his parish, and trusted him. Coyne was a “customers’ man” for Goodbody & Co., a stock brokerage house in New York with a branch office at North Adams in charge of one Dudley. The plaintiff closed out his account with another brokerage house, and through Coyne opened a margin account with Goodbody & Co. on September 27, 1927. He did all his business with Goodbody & Co. through Coyne. At the close of business on October 28, 1929, Goodbody & Co. held for the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hastings v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Myers v. Moore-Kile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
- C. A. Briggs Co. v. National Wafer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- William Gardam & Son v. BattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Codman v. BeaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Watkins v. Simplex Time Recorder Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Union Old Lowell National Bank v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Buckley v. JohnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.