Legal Opinion
Noyes v. Marlott
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1907No. 1,438PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, District Judge.
Defendants in error, Marlott, Melvin, and O’Mealey, brought this suit to recover the contract price of certain logs alleged to have been delivered by them to Noyes, plaintiff in error, in accordance with the provisions of a *844certain written contract entered into on September 23, 1904. The contract is substantially as follows: “This agreement made this 23d day of September, 1904, by and between Fred G. Noyes, party of the first part, and Tony O’Mealey, John Melvin, and Arthur Marlott, parties of the second part, witnesseth: (1) That said parties of the second part agree to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Barnard v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Bliven v. New England Screw Company.Supreme Court of the United States · 1860
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Port Valdez Company v. City of ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Kahn v. RosenstielDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924
- Donlan v. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Cook v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1911