Donlan v. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The position of the- appellants is that, although the District Court was right in holding that the contract, together with the bills of sale, constituted an absolute 'sale and transfer of the title, it fell into error in refusing to hold that they could recover the market value of the lumber destroyed by fire, less advances made by the lumber company on the purchase and the percentages provided by the contract.
We think the construction of the contract as one of sale and transfer of title by Donlan & Henderson to the lumber company was correct. Not only do…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- The Elgee Cotton CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The TornadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Frank v. Butte & Boulder Mining & Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
- Noyes v. MarlottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, D. Montana · 1923
- The Fred E. HaslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932