Legal Opinion

Dornik v. Maurice (In Re Maurice)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 31, 1992No. 19-05360PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the complaint of John F. Dornik (“Dornik”) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2) and (a)(6) for a determination of the dischargeability of a certain debt owed him by the debt- or/defendant John A. Maurice (the “Debt- or”), together with Dornik’s motion for sanctions. For the reasons set forth below, the Court, having considered all the pleadings and evidence adduced at trial by way of testimony and exhibits, does hereby find the debt nondischargeable. The motion for sanctions is allowed.

I. JURISDICTION AND…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Francine Klingman v. Melvin E. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. In the Matter of Ben F. Garman, Bankrupt. The Northern Trust Company v. Ben F. GarmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rezin v. Barr (In Re Barr)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. Union National Bank of Marseilles v. Leigh (In Re Leigh)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  3. In the Matter of John A. Maurice, Debtor. Appeal of Kenneth A. KozelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. Haeske v. Arlington (In Re Arlington)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Katahn Associated, Inc. v. Wien (In Re Wien)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API