Legal Opinion
Haeske v. Arlington (In Re Arlington)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 6, 1996No. 19-04303PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN H. SQUIRES, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the amended complaint of Richard Haeske (“Richard”) pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6) to determine the dischargeability of a debt owed to him by the debtor, Mary Arlington (“Mary”), his former spouse. For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds that the debt is dischargeable under § 523(a)(2)(A), but is nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6).
I. JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE
The Court has jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334 and General Rule 2.33(A) of the United…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In the Matter of Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor. Goldberg Securities, Inc. v. Richard C. Scarlata, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Meyer v. RigdonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- In the Matter of Marvin C. THIRTYACRE, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bletnitsky v. Jairath (In Re Jairath)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Spring Works, Inc. v. Sarff (In Re Sarff)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Dobek (In Re Dobek)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Rae v. Scarpello (In Re Scarpello)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Fidelity Financial Services v. Cox (In Re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.