American Family Mutual Insurance v. Williams
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McKINNEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, American Family Mutual Insurance Company (“American”), has moved for summary judgment. The parties have filed their briefs and the issues are ready to be resolved; For the reasons discussed below, this Court GRANTS American’s motion for summary judgment. ’■
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The parties do not dispute the facts. In December 1991, the defendants, Antonya M. Williams (“Antonya”) and Dorothy M. Williams (“Dorothy”) were married and residing in the same household in Indianapolis. On December 19, 1991,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Paper Manufacturers Co. v. Rescuers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
- Ram Products Co., Inc. v. ChaunceyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of BussellDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
- Illinois National Insurance v. TemianDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.