Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Rosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 23, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

As part of his duties as a field service representative, claimant was responsible for making visits to participating medical providers at their offices. The employer conducted an audit of office visit documentation prepared by claimant and discovered certain inaccuracies as well as fraudulent signatures. As a result, claimant was terminated from his position.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MarioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of McFarlaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of NovakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of WightmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. In re the Claim of MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API