Legal Opinion

Sears v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1982No. 81-1157PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Teamsters Local 243 appeals an order of the District Court, 507 F.Supp. 658, vacating an arbitration award.

Local 243 is the collective bargaining representative for warehouse and service employees at five Sears stores in the Detroit, Michigan area. Twelve percent of this bargaining unit consists of “MA” sales employees who sell Sears appliance maintenance contracts by telephone.

In December, 1978, Sears subcontracted the work of the entire MA sales staff, thereby eliminating ninety jobs. The laid-off employees were permitted to “bump” into other job classifications pursuant to the Job…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Detroit Coil Company v. International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Lodge 82Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  4. The Timken Company v. Local Union No. 1123, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  5. Amanda Bent Bolt Company, Amanda, Ohio v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1549Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sears, Roebuck And Company v. Teamsters Local Union No. 243Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API