Legal Opinion

State v. Newman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 2012No. 2D11-3365PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LaROSE, Judge.

The State appeals the trial court’s order granting Paul Newman a new trial due to juror misconduct. It argues that the trial court abused its discretion and that the juror’s misconduct, reading aloud portions of the Constitution during deliberations, was harmless. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(c)(1)(C), (c)(3). We reverse.

A trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to grant a new trial. Chatmon v. State, 738 So.2d 970, 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We will not overturn a trial court’s order granting a new trial absent a clear abuse of that discretion. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Huff v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Devoney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  5. State v. HartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The State of Florida v. Kevin PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API