Legal Opinion

Bell v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1976No. 7622SC418PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

Defendants assign as error the issuance of the supplemental order which stayed collection of costs. Among other grounds, they assert lack of notice and hearing under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 6(d) and Rule 7(b) (1).

G.S. 1A-1, Rule 60(b) (6) would allow the court to relieve plaintiff from the costs imposed in the final judgment for any reason “justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Although not denominated as such, we view plaintiffs’ motion as one under Rule 60(b) (6) to relieve them of the costs of the depositions taken by defendants if plaintiffs prevail in the action to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steele v. Moore-Flesher Hauling CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Gardner v. Price Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Macon v. EdingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API