Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Price Ex Rel. Price

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1954No. 17PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Tbis appeal is premature. It is from a nonappealable, interlocutory order. Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377; Raleigh v. Edwards, 234 N.C. 528, 67 S.E. 2d 669.

In the bearing below it was not contemplated tbat Judge Morris should bear and determine tbe entire controversy. Tbe parties stipulated tbat tbe inquiry should be limited to a determination of tbe single question whether tbe judgment entered by Judge Nimocks in tbe prior action brought to set aside tbe deed may be collaterally attacked in tbis proceeding. Tbe order entered by Judge Morris recites tbat tbe scope of inquiry…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Hines v. . HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Emry v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Blackwell v. . McCaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API