Legal Opinion
In Re Goldman
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 16, 1995No. 19-30050PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WILLIAM C. HILLMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Introduction
On November 29, 1994, I issued an order denying the Debtor’s claim of exemption in his Individual Retirement Account (“IRA”) to the extent that it exceeded 7% of his total income during the five years preceding the date on which he filed for relief under the Bankruptcy Code pursuant to the last sentence of M.G.L. ch. 235, § 34A (the “Order”). The Debtor subsequently filed a motion for relief from the Order (the “Motion”). The chapter 7 trustee, Michael Feinman (the “Trustee”), opposes the relief…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, Atlantic & Gulf Maritime Region v. Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- In Re MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990
- In Re Wedgestone FinancialUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- In Re PrintyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- In Re HennesseyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cisneros v. Kim (In Re Kim)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,261, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2639, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23931l in Re Peter D. Barshak, Debtor. In Re Christine Shubert, Esquire, Duly Qualified and Acting Chapter 7 TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Roumeliots v. Popa (In Re Popa)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1997
- Goldman v. Feinman (In Re Goldman)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- In Re BarshakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.