Legal Opinion

Etter v. SAFECO INS. CO. OF ILLINOIS

District Court, D. Montana

Decided March 22, 2002No. 9:19-mcr-00009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOLLOY, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Oren D. Etter moves for summary judgment on his claim that Safeco acted in bad faith in violation of MCA 33-18-201 when it refused to advance-pay $60,000 for medical expenses incurred by Etter as a result of an accident with Safe-co’s insured. Etter claims Safeco did not question liability in the accident, nor did Safeco question whether Etter’s medical expenses were caused by the accident. Safeco also moves for summary judgment, arguing it did not act in bad faith because it offered to pay Etter the policy limits of $100,000 and its insured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Watters v. Guaranty National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Craig v. SchellMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Juedeman v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ensey v. Colorado CasualtyMontana Supreme Court · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mears v. Safeco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API